COURSEWORK BRIEF
Module Leader Email Phone Office Phil Sainter http://www.1daixie.com/liuxueshengzuoye/ Ext:4474 F1.10
代写留学生作业Module Number: 2BIS655 Module Name: Project Management Coursework Title: Coursework Coursework Deadline: 12 April 2010 at 6pm. Please remember this is the deadline, however I strongly encourage you to attempt to submit before this date. Coursework Instructions: The coursework for this module is to produce an academic report investigating the Burj Khalifa project. The coursework must have the following: An analysis of the project in terms of stakeholders, scope, technology, change issues and project management issues. An analysis of academic theory versus practice of this project. You should compare this project against other similar projects. Additional briefing will occur throughout the module, please ensure you attend the sessions or have access to other people’s notes. The coursework must not be longer than 4000 words. This coursework is an individual piece of coursework. Coursework Submission: You are required to submit your coursework to TURNITIN as well as submitting your coursework in the normal fashion (hardcopy to the undergraduate office). Failure to submit your work to TURNITIN will cause your coursework not to be marked even if submitted to the undergraduate office (Academic Regulation 6.8). In order for you to submit your work to TURNITIN (viahttp://www.1daixie.com/liuxueshengzuoye/), you will need to enrol upon the class within TURNITIN using the following information: CLASS ID: 169576 Enrolment Password: project
Marking Criteria: The coursework will be assessed using the following marking criteria. Design & structure of report (5%) Discussion about the selected project (20%) Critical analysis of the project (25%) Analysis of how this Project relates to the other related projects (10%) Report results (15%) Conclusions (15%) References and use of references (10%) Please read the marking guide on the following page to help you determine the levels you need to achieve for each grade. Academic Offences: Academic offences, including plagiarism, are treated very seriously in the Westminster Business School. A student who is proven to have committed an academic offence may be placing his or her degree in jeopardy. It is your responsibility as a student to make sure that you understand what constitutes an academic offence, and in particular, what plagiarism is and how to avoid it.
Level
No evidence to suggest that any learning has taken place beyond the most basic principles. 1-9 0 (0) 0
Makes no serious attempt to answer the question, and has little or no coherence. What little evidence exists to show that learning has taken place is interspersed with nonsense. 10-19 1-9 0 0
Makes a limited attempt to answer the question but demonstrates a clear lack of understanding of the issues concerned. Misunderstandings and errors of fact are likely to outweigh correct or meaningful statements. There is unlikely to be any referencing. The poor quality of the writing may make it difficult to read. 20-29 10-19 1-9 0
Attempts to answer the question but is only partly successful in doing so, with much irrelevant material included and much relevant material left out. Referencing is likely to be limited. It should show at least an emerging understanding of the issues, but is likely to Include some fundamental misunderstandings and/or errors of fact. It may well lack structure and be poorly written. 30-39 20-29 10-19 1-9
Makes a clear attempt to answer the question, but is likely to include material of doubtful relevance. It may well be based largely on a single text- book, or on lecture notes, but shows at least a basic understanding of the issues. There may be some significant misunderstandings or errors of fact. Structure may be confused and language clumsy.
40-49 30-39 20-29 10-19
Is clearly focussed on the question and demonstrates a general understanding of the major issues without significant misunderstandings or errors of fact. It may well demonstrate a degree of naivety and is likely to be largely descriptive in nature. It should be properly referenced, but may be based on a limited number of sources, principally text-books. It should have a coherent structure, but may have some clumsy expression.
50-59
40-49 30-39 20-29
Demonstrates a detailed understanding of the major issues and at least a general awareness of problems and conflicting viewpoints. Reading is likely to go beyond basic textbooks, and should show at least an emerging ability to compare and contrast the arguments in different sources. It should be well-structured and well-written.
60-69
50-59
40-49 30-39
Demonstrates a full understanding of the major issues and a full awareness of problems and conflicting viewpoints. It should include references to secondary as well as tertiary sources (journal articles, monographs etc.) and should demonstrate at least an emerging ability to evaluate and criticise sources. The quality of argument should demonstrate a degree of sophistication and elegance.
70-79
60-69
50-59 40-49
Demonstrates a clear ability to evaluate and criticise sources and at least an emerging ability to apply original insight and thought to the issues under discussion. There should be at least a limited understanding of theoretical issues. If the analysis of primary data is included this should be conducted with at least a basic degree of competence.
80-89
70-79
60-69
50-59
Demonstrates a clear ability to apply original insight and critical thought to the issues under discussion, and a clear understanding of the problems and limitations of the approaches developed. It should demonstrate a degree of sophistication in the way in which theory and practice are integrated. If the analysis of primary data is included this should be conducted with complete competence and with a degree of sophistication.
90-99
80-89
70-79
60-69
Theoretically informed, with a high degree of originality and an effective integration of secondary and primary data. It should be capable of adaptation with a limited amount of effort either for publication (though not necessarily in a peer-reviewed journal) or for effective professional use (e.g. a marketing strategy that could actually be presented to the Board).
100
90-99
80-89
70-79
http://www.1daixie.com/liuxueshengzuoye/Suitable for publication or effective professional use, as above, in its submitted form, without significant adaptation.
(100)
100
90-99
80-89
Suitable for publication as a significant article in a peer-reviewed journal, or as a highly innovative professional document.
(100)
(100)
100
90-100