论空军在阿富汗战争中的成与败
导读：军队一般分为海、陆、空三方面，虽然他们之间都各有各的优点与缺点，但是从近些年来看，空军逐渐展现出了其强大优势，本文将就空军的成败来做探讨，该文由第一代写网的作业写作中心英语作业写作频道整理提供。
Military might ha网上代写英语作业ve three dimensions, they are essentially known as Army, Air force and Navy. While each of them poses their distinct advantages and shortcomings, yet the recent two decade of warfare from 1990 until the date has seen a revolution in ground implementation of these three types of forces. In recent times Air force has stepped forward and prompted itself as a force with following strong points first代写英语作文 is the rapid projection of force, mobility and engagement second is improved strategic, operational and tactical situational awareness and third is Flexibility of targeting and reach.
However the global scenario of warfa英语作文怎么写re has changed rapidly after the Serbian War. The world can now again be envisioned as a bi polar force, in which on one side we have the modern regulation military forces, that may represent a nation, country or in some cases a group of countries like NATO, or a international interest custodian like the UN forces. For the case of the coalition forces英语作业代写多少钱, it is not about withdrawal if the chances are slim after the balancing of chances. It is about going back to the drawing board and adjusting the force characteristics so as to measure up to the field or battle field requirements.
If we analyze a country like Afghanistan and what the international forces are actually fighting there, we need to first understand the ground realities of the place. For ages it has been a place with a historical distinction that no one in history has ever been able to capture Afghanistan. Be it the invasion of Chengaiz Khan, the British rule over subcontinent or the USSR invasion in the eighties. For some predominant reason each force that was presumably a lethal military might of its time, chose to cross the land to move on. When Russia launched its own campaign to invade the country they failed miserably. Once has to acknowledge that part of the credit can be taken by the western world for that defeat. Based on these facts the present international forces choose to setup only Air force in Afghanistan as the main fighting weapon to country the insurgency issue. But we have seen a different scenario wherein either the Taliban have adopted better fighting skills or the United States of America as well as the NATO forces have failed to come up with a winning strategy. They backed their decision by utilizing technologies unknown and unseen in previous wars. Utilizing drones and unmanned aerial vehicles for reconnaissance, Intel gathering, and projection of fire power, is what the world was not familiar with prior to said war. As a second tool of option modern air forces are utilizing Precision Guided Munitions (PGMs) and smart and small bombs with an accuracy of less than 5meters to engage the enemy. For doing so Baghram Air Base is the largest setup of the international air forces in the region. The main aim behind the whole skirmish one can perceive is to keep humans as much out of the firing line and lot of battle as possible. The case needs to be dealt with decisively so that more lives are not lost whether they are the lives of the soldiers involved in combat or the lives of the common Afghanistan people This seems to be the prime objective in application of force in Afghanistan.（第一代写网http://www.1daixie.com/）
With regard to the style of military management that needs to applied for the realization of the end which is basically victory, the key elements needed are measurement, estimation of quantity, calculation, balancing of chances and lastly victory However, the targets for a military to overcome in war in any sphere of battle can be presented as stated by Colonel John Warden in his five ring theory. Even if we may not accept Warden's theory in totality, once can assume the five rings as five targets that each military force has to conquer in war, which is Leadership of the enemy forces, Organics/System Essentials, Infrastructure, Population and Fielded Military Forces.
Once the effectiveness of the air forces in the scenario of Afghanistan is studied baring in mind the above given five targets, any observer might get confused over the Slogan of Victory that has been heard in every street of USA and Europe. As despite all projection of technology and modernization of tactics, during last 10 years since 2001 till date the following facts still hold ground, which is the leadership of Al-Qaeda and Taliban are still alive and free, there were no visible organic or system essentials in Afghanistan, as the country never had any system or regular force that the international forces are fighting, there is no definite infrastructure of military or economic significance that may have affected the insurgents in Afghanistan, in contrast to what we could see in Iraq, the population of the Afghan country is a difficult phenomenon to understand, it is very hard to segregate the friend from the foe. equipping the Air Force with the latest technology cannot completely solve the problems posed by insurgents. Instead it may as well be throwing away of taxpayers' money if the same mistakes that have been committed in the past will be committed again, such as failing to study previous war reports and documentaries.
Therefore on ground application of force and that two a precise military like Air force seems to be an unclear and unsuccessful scenario, in Afghanistan when an F-16 aircraft fires two PGMs to blow up a house of sand and rubble in which it is perceived that two or three insurgents are hiding that have AK-47, and might be able to make unconventional IEDs (Improvised explosive devices). The economic equation seems totally out of balance. Not only this even if the insurgents are killed they are not a selected or specialist group of people whose training and deputation in the region has cost the force a handsome amount. Rather the next door neighbors who tend to lose a close one in the bombing itself, serve as fuel for the fire to continue.
Bibliography
Crews, R & Tarzi, A. (2009). The Taliban and the Crisis of Afghanistan. New York: Harvard University Press.
Rashid, A. (2009).Descent into Chaos: The U.S. and the Disaster in Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Central Asia. New York: Penguin Press.
Ricks, T. (2009). The Gamble: General David Petraeus and the American Military Adventure in Iraq, 2006-2008. New York: Penguin Press
Tzu, S. (1910).The Art of War. Project Gutenberg
Davis, Paul K. Besieged: 100 great sieges from Jericho to Sarajevo. New York: Oxford University Press US, 2003.
如果你对留学生作业感兴趣，请查看http://www.1daixie.com/liuxueshengzuoye/。